United Escape from European Union

In my lifetime I plan to get back my families estate which was stolen from us by British Petroleum in 1988. Once I regain ownership of Great House Farm Estate , I plan to compulsory purchase all of the 20 houses, demolish them ALL, then rebuild our original farm house (that occupied the land between the 1300's and 1988). Upon my death I will instruct the estate be gifted to the National Trust in order to safeguard our family estate and my legacy. 

In order to achieve this I'll need to extract £15 Million from my telecoms and advertising venture between 2015 and 2024. My commercial join-venture is based on a multi channel alliance agreement and platform development project that was founded by me, my former military colleagues and several advertisers, networks and teleco partners. Our capabilities are still in the prototype phase, nevertheless we managed to reach the finals of this years' Cisco British Innovation Award after being voted favourite to win. We're continuing to deploy our technology to market and intend to become fully operational throughout Britain during 2013.

In order to safeguard our plans against changes in the current eco, socio and political climate, I've decided to fold myself and my commercial activity into the ranks of a new lawful-rebellion movement. This empowers me and my allies with immunities from tyrannical legislation e.g. the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. I believe this entire document misunderstands how privacy is managed on advertising platforms and is hugely unjust.

To be specific, digital advertisers using ours (and other popular digital advertising platforms) only see faceless data e.g. age range, marital status etc, never the users raw data e.g. full name, partners name, home address etc. The EU directive introduces a blanket punishment that doesn't account for this thorough understanding. This restricts ethical innovations in this area of technology; especially the 'mover and shaker' solution we're about to deploy to the marketplace.

To explain this to the layman let's take the power transformer of your laptop. You're highly unlikely to get a shock from the end that goes into the laptop because the mains power and the laptop power are physically separated. The voltage actually converts from 240v to 9v by turning the power into a magnetic field then back into electricity on the other side.

 

So when some directive forces the guys who make the transformers their way, thus changing what already works, "to avoid electric shock" it's only raises my suspicions to say the least. In my view this directive is a replica of the speed camera scam. The Government said the enforcement was to reduce speed and deaths, but it was really because the Government owed the banks so much money that they decided to introduce a new legislation that generates Billions a year in speeding fines. Instead of repaying debt with this revenue, they borrow more against this extra income, which only repeats the madness. The banks will continue to act as rogue institutions because thy rely on this, which is business as usual for capitalists like them. They simply do their feasibility studies and set-aside budgets for the regulators fines that they expect (such as HSBC's £445Million recently, which is even considered optimistically low considering their crimes).

The outcome is that Governments enslave their nation further in-order to dig themselves out of the hole they've just jumped back into. This madness inevitability continues in politics and law because we're in a monetary society and capitalists run it. So when you hear of laws which need our vote, of course you'll hear on the news about some 'one in a billion person' who got a shock from his laptop power lead; failing to leave out the fact that water was spilled while the casing was removed. Nothing to do with failing in the way it operates.

With stricter legislations that penalize pioneers, the EU are now at the mercy of the their banks and not the Europeans they represent. The other commercial objective of the world Government is to legislate and monetize the entire internet and information highway flow, but this is a delicate balance that has to be done systematically because of inherent rights that are being removed, such as free speech etc. The most extreme case being Julian Paul Assange of WikiLeaks.

Even if you open your eyes enough to see website owners who are responding to this data protection directive you'll have already noticed they're introducing popups which require it's visitors to consent to cookies before they gain access to the information. This 'cause and effect' of EU legislation has forced opportunity for censorship to say the least, as we're now required to enter into a transaction before gaining access to the information. The terms of this transaction only need to be amended a few times and we have a full scale, licensed, taxed and censored internet being enforced.

I'm not too concerned about anything until it hits my doorstep, but now it's arrived I'm mad as hell and doing something about it. World governments and their benefactors need to realize that their usefulness to modern  society is outlived. It's time to invest in placing their wisdom into apps then going home and retiring to the history e-books.

So how does all this apply to you and me ? Well until recently I, for example, conducted all of my personal affairs and commercial activity under a legislated title; 'Sion' 'Hywel' 'Buckler'. A title which I've only discovered to be owned by, and in contract with, British Government since my parents accepted my Birth Certificate. Let me explain how this works; 

The process our parents endured to register us as a new born is so swiftly managed by the Government it actually manages to hide the most important transaction we've ever been entered into. The Government informs us of no alternative but for our parents to enter us onto the Live Birth Record and receive (and accept) a Birth Certificate in receipt. The actual transaction our parents do with the Government in these few short moments are very important when you begin to understand its significance on our lives. There's no way the Government would inform us of an alternative to this process, or highlight the significance of this transaction, because it only acts to their detriment. Allow me to explain; 

Regardless of the detail of the spelling, names all serve the same purpose. It's our method to known each other, a name we're recognized through. A Live Birth Record is a record of the event of our births. This document contains the name our parents created for us. Born on our lands, we (the above named), immediately inherit common law rights, such as the right to travel in ones own conveyance of the day, un-hindered, without license or insurance etc and human rights which include;  

• Information and communication technologies  
• Reproductive rights
• Water
• Trade
• Sexual orientation and gender identity
• Future generations
• Thought, conscience and religion
• Speech
• Right to a fair trial
• Freedom from slavery
• Freedom from torture 
• Right to life

Birth Certificates on the other hand are a separate, Government issued and owned documents.  Despite the Live Birth Record and the Birth Certificate containing the exact same names, the two documents are completely different. Birth Certificates mirror the naming process carried out by our parents, but instead they are the issuing of a legislated title. To understand this fully you first need to understand what title is;

Everything is done through title. Your title is your status. Your status in society is important. Especially in the case of trust law. Trust law is highly complex. To understand trust law it helps to understand what creates a trust. A trust is when there's two titles to property. One title is a Legal title, the other is Equitable title. A trust is created when those titles are split. One party is sent one title and the other party retains the other title. So when the legal title is sent to one party, they become the trustee of that property. When the remaining party retain equitable title they become the beneficiary of that property. 

Firstly, a Live Birth Record is evidence that our name is in fact an estate or trust. The bearer of the Live Birth Record becomes the legal title holder of that trust (the name granted to us by our parent).  With our parents signature on this document it's our parents who are the equitable title holder. The Government retain this document, making them the new legal title holder, thus trustees in our names. 

This is a necessary measure because we're happy to give the government the means to manage us, our resources and our country. But overlooked is the fact that we were always the equitable title holders of our name and title. Making us the beneficiary of everything they are employed to do on our land. So our parents generated us and our titles. We are the equitable title holders and there's a birth register which gives the government legal title to use of our names for management purposes. 

But the Government issue us a birth certificate in which they are the equitable title holders. We are limited to operate under that title (e.g birth certificate required for passport, bank account, driving license etc). Since they now hold equitable title of the name we operate under, they ultimately own us. We only have the right of use to our name. (Usufruct - Right of use under Common Law). This begins to explain why the Governments hold so much of the power and wealth that we collectively create, and why we as the landowners and occupiers, see so little of that power and wealth.

My name given to me by my parents was Sion Hywel Buckler which means; 

SION - "When humanity set forth on its path to self destruction, at least we were wise enough to build in a failsafe - that would simply allow us to remember what we have forgotten, by forgetting what we have remembered."

HYWEL - "He was also successful in defending his territories, for there is no record that they were ravaged by the Vikings during his reign. Neither were they attacked by the English "

BUCKLER - The Buckler had a variety of roles when it came to swordplay, but five principal means come to the fore. Each use recognizes the shield's small size and maneuverability when dealing with light blades. Hand protection, Deflector, Blinder, Metal Fist and Binder"

Although my birth name and family name was created by my family, I abandoned it at birth. My entire activity to date has been done under a Birth Certificate identification which I have only just discovered. Ignorant of this fact I've unknowingly been forced to welcome and operate-under, a title which is governed under the jurisdiction of Statutory and Regulatory Law. I've also unknowingly been voided any claim that I've ever operated under my freeman title, 'sion hywel of the buckler family', which has overriding inherit rights under the jurisdiction of Common Law of my lands.

So I now choose to exercise my right to operate under my alternative (and carefully worded), freeman title; 'sion' 'hywel' 'of the buckler family', which creates enough clear distinction in title to avoid confusion between the two titles. Under the latter title I can now operate as a 'freeman on my land' which entitles me to my inherent rights and places me under the jurisdiction of Common Law. With inverse effect to the above it also quashes any claim or confusion that I operate under my regulatory title, which would have otherwise forced me under the restrictive jurisdiction of Statutory and Regulatory Law.

To peacefully operate as a 'free-man on my land' it's important I maintain this clear distinction between both titles under which I chose to operate under. I've created this distinction between the two titles by making amendments to the case and wordings. It's therefore of great importance that the titles I operate under be perfectly accurate in order to avoid confusion when determining the jurisdiction my activities fall under.

To give you an idea of the challenges I face while rescinding this control I'll begin with Facebook.

(1) As an individual user on Facebook I'm experiencing difficulty updating my title from 'Sion Hywel  Buckler' to 'sion hywel of the buckler family'.

I encounter two problems while doing this;

   a) Facebook's text fields automatically applies capital letters on the text I submit.

   b) Secondly, you only allow single word surnames.

This is seemingly insignificant and has never mattered to me through my life of ignorance, but in law Facebook is only accepting and recognizing users who use their regulated titles, which forces us to only welcome the jurisdiction of Statutory and Regulatory Law. Facebook restrict the use of users freeman titles and the common law jurisdiction option, which inevitably causes confusion as to which title the users is intending to operate his/her Facebook account with.

(2) As the founder of a new technology platform which utilizes Facebook's Social Graph, it's of huge important to my team that your users titles are of their own choosing and not a title format that's forced onto them, which also acts to pervert users choice of which jurisdiction both parties of your terms fall into.

Facebook's limitations in the creation of user title, as detailed above, forces inconsistencies when social profile login access is merged in-conjunction with 3rd party site terms that might only present freeman consented terms and agreements, e.g forcing the agreements to be entered-into by parties using their freeman names only. This forces the jurisdiction of Common Law and excludes unwelcomed parties such as Government, EU and their Statutory and Regulatory Laws, which repeatedly hinder innovation and manufactures scarcity and a divide between individuals and nations.

The next challenge to exercise my new found freedoms would be rescind my oath of allegiance to the queen which I signed as 'Sion Hywel Buckler' when joined the Army in 2002.

Hywel Ap Buckler
Founder
Trusted Office / Wave Telecoms