Internet.org and Wave

This blog-post highlights the differences and similarities between Wavetele.com and internet.org. Both technology ventures are in the early phases of releasing a technology which will transform digital communications, from an affordable privilege to a free human right. Both technology ventures are also helpful in the inevitable transition from our industrial economic model and into the new and emerging knowledge and resource-based economic system.

Sion Hywel Ap Buckler. (born October 24, 1984) is a former British Defence cyber security and telecommunications engineer. Best known as son of the Welsh farmer in the famous legal case BP Properties vs Buckler [1987]. Becoming a tech entrepreneur and received honourable discharge in 2007, Buckler founded several ventures, the most recent of which is WAVE.	Mark Elliot Zuckerberg (born May 14, 1984) is an American computer programmer and internet entrepreneur. He is best known as one of five co-founders of the social networking website Facebook. Zuckerberg is the chairman and chief executive of Facebook.
Wavetele.com	Internet.org
Wave was founded by Buckler and his community of British Defence Telecommunications and Cyber Security Engineers. Buckler's technology proposal to make internet a free and inherent right, first appeared on the world stage during the 2012 World Conference of International Telecommunications (WCIT) in Dubai. Waves Integration alliance of trusted partners now collaborate on the development, share Waves working capital and hold early equity in the technology.  As a community specialising in the cyber defence of British telecommunications, Waves was developed in order to give every natural person an equally peaceful means of migrating to a new economic model.	Internet.org was founded by Zuckerberg, Facebook, Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera, Qualcomm and Samsung.  It's a global partnership between technology leaders, non-profits, local communities and experts who are working together to bring the Internet to the two thirds of the world’s population that don't have it. Sharing tools, resources and best practices, Internet.org partners will explore solutions in three major opportunity areas: affordability, efficiency and business models.

How does Wave propose to connect two-thirds of the world ?

Technology

Wave began in 2010 when Buckler hacked a WiFi hotspot and covertly placed an invisible layer between the subjects web-browser and the websites they visited. This was achieved by hacking the hotspots firmware and imposing a cloud based web-browser emulator which interacted with the browsers url requests. Instead of the router returning a url, it would place it in the emulator which would then refresh in the users browser. This innovation gave rise to new commercial opportunities in the area of ad delivery.

The first application of Buckler's ground-breaking technology was the superimposing of display ads onto the lower 10% of the emulator. Users connected to Wave's free WiFi hotspot would see a constant banner ad under each webpage they visited, regardless of the browser they used or webpage they visited. Ad blocking technologies also fail to operate on Wave. Users connecting to Wave networks also had no awareness that the ads are were being generated from the hotspot and not the webpage. 

Market

From 2011 this accomplishment allowed Waves network partners to transpose their billing model, giving them a share of advertising revenues, in exchange they their users free internet access. A win win model. Wave's network-based display advertising approach gives advertisers a totally new alternative to online advertising. As the platform develops Wave expects ad spend to slowly shift from the popular online ad platforms e.g Facebook Ads, Google AdWords & Bling Ads, to network based ad platforms such as Wave and most recently, Ovivo. Due to the immense engagement and ROI that these case studies present, Wave is expected to move into the marketplace quickly and experience exponential growth from as early as 2015. 

For more targeted marketing Wave also uses it's own social profile account service to identify users before granting them internet access.

Assumptions

Sir Michael Moritz has given guidance on the Wave project since early 2011. In Moritz experience, ad-only networks have a tendency to fail, so it was suggested that Wave's core product become something else. During this time Sion was already piecing together the work of many of the people that influenced him and an secondary application for the technology was becoming apparent.

Dean Clifford in Canada and John Harris and Roger Hayes (of the lawful rebellion movement) in Britain). These 3 men helped with the understand and reverse engineering of our entire judicial system and society. Adrian Lamo is a US itinerant who also inspires the benefits and freedoms of being a cyber outlaw without a fixed address.

Thomas Powers in Britain. A pioneer who founded Leadors and the concept of ORS. (A paradigm shift from those working within an institutional to those working within social networks.

The venus project in the US. Jacque Fresco has designed a future city which operated on the concept of a resource based economy.

Discussions with these modern influencers enabled Sion to refine Wave's charter and mandate. The assumption made was that the world is now on the doorstep of a new level of human development. One where we are all able to maintain the planet and its population to a higher standard of living through the use of technology. As each new level of human development was reached e.g cave-based, hunters, agricultural and industrial, the economic system needed to evolve. This revolutionary technology opportunity became the new focus for Wave.

But as has been explained in this blog, the emergence of a virtual economic model and it's battle to become the dominant social framework, will cause people to unsubscribe from the industrial economic model and subscribe to the resource and knowledge based systems. This transition may cause civil unrest and even a global cyber civil war, but it will likely happen in a matter of months, weeks or even days. This is because of the increasing speed and limiting traction that new technologies encounter reaching people.

Since 2011 Wave has been developing it's technology and business model as a free internet technology. But its more important function is to serve mankind as a delivery vehicle for a new era of open-applications which give every natural person on the planet access to a more trusted and effective system than the ones used over the last 150,000 years.

Our entire system of Law can now to evolve with a Wave application, which Eric Schmidt calls 'dual-crowdsourcing'; (Incident reporting up to the cloud, justice down from the cloud)

Our entire monetary system now evolve with a Wave application called Logarithmic Social Scoring (LSS) - (individuals social scores (1-100) begin in the middle (50) and work upwards or downwards each month depending on endorsements from the community. This type of scoring becomes the new social class system and access to resources are determined from this score)

Our entire governmental system can now evolve using a dynamic title and LSS-based resource management application. (whereas a government is centralised and is trusted to manage our lands, resources and titles, a decentralised, open and transparent system could return that management back to citizens. This is anarchy but not chaos. Anarchy only means decentralised, so this would be organised anarchy.

From this work, Wave's estimated pre-money value grew, from £500,000 in 2011 to over £3.8million in 2013. When the Alpha platform is launched in 2014 the technology is expected to receive a £10m+ valuation.

Human  right vs Inherent right

Wave proposes a technology solution which will make internet access free to everyone.

Zuckerberg claim is that connectivity should be a 'human right',

Buckler's claim is that Wave will make connectivity an 'inherent right'. The difference in wording is slight, but the politics are very different.

Zuckerberg effort will require him to have huge levels of trust, perhaps even diplomatic immunity. But can Mark Zuckerberg be trusted to operate with a sense of lawfulness, patriotism, constitution and sovereignty. This effort to transform digital communications and interconnectivity into a human right is to remind people of natural law and their rights and freedoms. Many of which have been replaced with benefits and privileges of a governmental system. Remember, William Wallace of Scotland had the same claim

From 2012 Wave's charter changed, from 'free internet for everyone' to 'digital communications as a free and inherent right'. 

Sion re-approached the architecture of the technology platform and positioned a slide-menu icon above the webpage. When pressed, the slide menu appears from the left of the screen and cloud based applications become visible. Unlike mobile applications or web based applications, Wave applications do not install onto the device and are not on the website being visited. Instead the menu and applications are generated from the access point the device connects to. As with the display ads (which remain constant under the webpages), Waves applications also use SVG to rescale to fit any device.

During this period of re-design to Waves core offering, the business structure was also changed. The result is no longer a legal entity but a lawful one; A trust which is called the Extropy Trust that proceeds to operate under natural laws. The companies behind Wave (Trusted Advertising Limited and Wave Telecom Limited) are now trustee's of the Extropy Trust. All seed fund investors in Wave became beneficiaries of the Extropy Trust (and recipients of the licence fees from the trustee companies). Startup investors in the trustee companies are it's stakeholders and divide the companies profits accordingly. As explained in this conversation between Sion and InvestorZone. 

Whilst on their homeland under 4th domain (land) rules, the Extropy Trusts' beneficiaries self-proclaim allodial ownership of the Wave technology platform. This process is largely complex and is explained in detail on the following blog. But in short the patronymic 'ap' is introduced before each surname to highlight that The Extropy Trust are operating under the natural laws of trust, whilst occupying and defending Waves 5th domain (cyber) estate from threats; especially and including Government.

This is also important to the legal and lawful process of maintaining high-ground during the shift to a new economic and judicial system e.g dual-crowdsourcing. Sometime in this the near future, trust and control of resource management is expected to de-centralise into orderly anarchy, thus alleviating a core function and purpose of our archaic approach of a trusted and centralised Government for management of resources on our lands.

This structure and proclamation of sovereignty allows for lawful and legal development and upkeep of a de-centralised technology platform that cannot be intervened by enforcers of policy which systematically outlaw a revolutionary technology which has the potential to interconnect the world while at the same time giving people equal access to revolutionary applications. One such application is an alternative to todays monetary and resource management system which uses logarithmic social scoring to better orbit transactions around equality not quantity. The entire theme of this research and development was published into a document which was titled Operation Tech Saxon.

The Op Tech Saxon paper was then handed out to over 170 world leaders and the worlds largest telecom companies at the WCIT in Dubai in December 2012. The debate erupted with the hand out of this document. The ambassador of the US department of state even claimed that this document 'polluted and hijacked the debate'.

This is because Sion understood that the solution to connecting the worlds remaining 5 billion cannot come from within our systems of law, money and government. In order for us to create a higher standard of living for the entire planet, the economic system must evolve. But in order to do this we must stand back, unlearn the system of law, currency and government and rethink the fabric of social architecture from the paradigm of natural law, rights and freedoms, lawfulness, constitution and sovereignty. This is a new paradigm that challenges us because we have been dependant on our current social systems and structure for over 150,000 years. Exercising this deep understanding of law and lawfulness was very difficult for Sion to put into practice as explained in this letter to his MP. (click share, download if your web browser will not display the letter)

Buckler also welcomed Zuckerberg to the Wave initiative. However, this invitation to work collaboratively was ignored by Zuckerberg and all of the telecoms companies at the WCIT. Within 6 months they had all partnered-up and formed internet.org. This entities alliance approach and mission statement (to make communications a human right), has remarkable resemblance to the Wave projects charter and integration alliance.

Looking beyond the surface of this you will see more examples of differences between Zuckerberg and Sion's technical approach, values and standards.

Internet.org is NOT a selfles philanthropic effort to connect the world or move us to a new economic system. It's a capitalists ploy to dominate a window of opportunity for a revolution of equality to occur. This plot ensures wealth and power is maintained thus exacerbating global inequality.

"There came into Egypt a Pharaoh who did not know! This is a prophecy in the 1987 Wall Street movie. Sion continues this famous scene by saying "The rich have been doing this to the poor since the beginning of time. The only difference between the Pyramids and online platforms is that the egyptians didn't allow hacktivism. I know what Zuckerberg is all about. Greed! He doesn't give a damn about the faces of the disconnected 5 billion. He's in and out for the buck and he doesn't take prisoners".

Some more interesting philosophy worth reading is the meaning of the words Sion Hywel and Buckler. 

Sion raised the question, query and concern that free internet access and a revolutionary technology such as the Wave platform, could result in a move to a new economic system via a cyber civil war. But amidst internet.org's launch in the mainstream media, this focus has shifted over the last few weeks. Zuckerberg is now claiming this idea as his own and he's proposing his approach to achieving it. But the question still remains, if this is such a powerful technology that has so much potential, why is Mark Zuckerberg someone who should be trusted with it? The bottom line is, he's not and people are beginning to wise up to this.

The offence here has not been committed against Sion or Wave, it's been committed against anyone consuming knowledge of the illusion internet.org and zuckerberg are trying to create. International sovereignty is really under attack as the fight for power in the new economic model begins. With a technology which can determine users identity and title before granting them privilege or benefits, the owner of it really does become a gatekeeper of a 5th domains new judicial system. That's why this technology opportunity needs to be explored by men of honour and nobility and not just a wealthy and powerful capitalist.

In a sense, you could look at internet.org as a deterrent to Wave's technology solution. If Facebook or Google are seen to be offering a free internet solution, it takes the focus off a more liberating approach such as the one Wave is developing. But it's pure trickery. Facebook and Zuckerberg will undoubtedly become even more successful from internet.org, but not at the expense of Wave. 

Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are playing their current position of strength because they've realised that Wave, FreedomPop and Ovivo are bringing attention to the fact that network based ad platforms (where ads generated from the network override the webpages) are a better alternative for advertisers and the solution flips the old user based billing model on its head, making internet access free to the end user. If this were to happen without the co-operation of popular websites it would be harmful to their monopoly on digital ad spend.

In 2011 Facebook and Google took countermeasures to stop this security breach. They stopped their webpages being accessed by users on Wave networks. But Wave's team took measures to hack around this and resume users access to Facebook and Google. Facebook and Google hacked around this and warfare began between Wave and these two tech giants. Today, Google is accessible on Wave's network. 

Online ad-platforms such as Google and Facebook need power levelling. They've hoarded billions and caused huge bottlenecks of inequality at an industry level. Network operators are getting the middle finger from these giants each time they ask for a share of their immense revenue chanel. For example, telefonica's boss asked Google for some cash in 2012 for all the YouTube traffic they handle, but their endeavour was unsuccessful. The networks then have to overbill their end-users in order to sustain (a completely unlawful and unnecessary situation). Facebook and Google's greed in this situation has effectively caused the influx in data consumption to inflate network usage costs.

The Wave team continues to unveil unlawful and unconstitutional activity from Google and Facebook which is now at the forefront of our challenge to develop a sustainable free ads-for-access internet service. Facebook claim to want to make internet access free but they block themselves from appearing on networks that are trialing Waves free internet technology. They might like the crown of being a free internet solution provider, bit not enough to loosen their monopoly on ad-spend. Not blockading Wave would allow advertisers to move to our more effective network based ad-platform. instead Facebook unlawfully and unconstitutionally hinder Waves success, by denying its free internet users access to Facebook and Google. 

But this is where Waves background in cyber security and electronic warfare comes into play. Each time websites like Facebook & Google take a countermeasure (to protect their monopoly on ad spend) our team hack around it. In response Facebook & Google hack around Wave hack, and so on. Wave has successfully worked around Google's most recent block but we expect these sort of fun and games to continue Facebook are also very good at this sort of warfare. 

More and more websites that are greedy with ad revenues will likely do the same. But it is expected that people will support a network-based free ads-for-access internet service. It's more democratic, lawful and encourages equality. 

Wave ads appear in front of websites, not on them

Wave apps are not in the cloud, nor on the device

One of our applications on the Wave App Store includes a monetary alternative called logarithmic social scoring. And with the help of our Social eXChange we also have an open, resource management app and dual-crowdsourcing app which collectively offers our users an alternative to the entire old systems of money, law and Government.

Wave helps the move to a new economic system

With the help of pioneering platforms such as Napster, PirateBay and WikiLeaks we're also set on de-centralising Wave. Seeing as we're such a threat to Facebook and Google's ad revenue model and the monetary, legal and governmental system, this is a necessary part of our strategy.

Internet.org and its telco partners will very likely launch a free Facebook mobile (like Amazon were mistakenly rumoured to be doing) and/or a free service plan (similar to Ovivo mobile). Google Freezone also launched an initiative In any case, Facebook is now feeling the pressure from its shareholders to grow its audience and subsequently its advertising revenues. Since Facebook is pretty much guaranteed that 50% of new internet users from any free internet initiative, will inevitably sign up to Facebook. This will help Facebook intercept Google's dominance of the global online ad spend. Shareholders in Facebook might be pleased to learn this, but not what I'm about to say.

Nobility and Honour

It's moral suicide for even the great Mark Zuckerberg to misplace his reputation and the trust he holds. Zuckerberg is claiming ownership of Buckler's work and Facebook is blockading Wave network users from accessing their social network. This is clearly a ploy to defer advertisers from switching to Wave and a claim to Sion's work while his team figure out the hack that is jeopardising Facebook's monopoly on advertisers. In any case, Zuckerberg's actions are unlawful and unconstitutional, and there's a community that will not forgive or forget this. This approach may serve Zuckerberg's capitalist agenda in the current economic model, but honour, trust and reputation is the new capital in the new and emerging economic model. Wave's entourage of British soldiers operate with a strong sense of constitution and lawfulness and understand this, but does Mark Zuckerberg ? Time will tell.